Notifications
Clear all

Roth Conversions and Future Tax Rates/Brackets

5 Posts
1 Users
1 Reactions
621 Views
(@pizzaman)
Prominent Member Customer
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 650
Topic starter  

I thought I would start a new thread specific to assessing future tax rates (brackets) as part of your decision on whether or not to do Roth Conversions.

The following article was in the New York Times "How much does America spend?". I am providing this information as facts to use in your decision making, not a political statement 🤐.

What the U.S. spends

Discussions about federal spending are difficult because the numbers are so large that they can be difficult to grasp. How many ordinary folks can truly comprehend how much $1 billion — that’s a thousand millions — is? And still, it’s a rounding error (just 0.01 percent of spending) compared with the nearly $7 trillion federal budget.

This is the context for the federal spending cuts led by President Trump and Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency. Last week, the administration announced its latest dismissals: 10,000 employees at the Department of Health and Human Services. That sounds like a lot of people, but it’s small for a government that employs three million civilian workers.

How much has DOGE pared back so far? Federal spending is actually higher this year than it was at this point in 2024, according to the Hamilton Project.

Today’s newsletter walks through what the federal government spends money on, to clarify these big numbers and show the actual effects of Trump’s efforts.

Growing debt

Since the early 2000s, the federal government has spent more money — sometimes much more — than it collects in taxes. That has caused the debt to grow to levels not seen since World War II.

Source: Congressional Budget Office | Chart excludes debt the federal government owes itself. | By The New York Times

For years, many economists downplayed concerns about the debt. Interest rates were low, and debt payments — the cost of borrowing all that money — were consequently low, too. Inflation was also low, which suggested that government spending hadn’t overheated the economy.

But interest rates and inflation have increased. Today, the federal government spends more to pay off its debt each year than it spends on Medicare or the military. Economists now warn that the federal debt is piling up too quickly.

At the same time, politicians are scared of cutting popular programs. Trump has ruled out cuts to Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and the military. Along with interest payments, that’s about 70 percent of what the government spends. There’s an old saying among wonks: The United States government is just an insurance company with a standing army.

Source: Treasury Department | Numbers may not add up to 100 percent due to rounding. | By The New York Times

All of the other programs you hear about (schools, welfare payments, foreign aid, medical research) make up roughly 30 percent of the federal budget. Trump would have to eliminate all of those to balance the budget without touching the programs he has deemed untouchable.

DOGE’s cuts

Trump and Musk claim they can eliminate most of the deficit by downsizing the federal work force — the Times is tracking the firings here — and ending waste and fraud. This is the work DOGE says it’s doing. But these efforts, too, are likely to fall short.

Presidents and Congress have launched many initiatives over the past few decades to tackle waste and fraud. They did not find significant savings. Watchdogs also track improper payments, which include fraud, duplicate charges and payments to ineligible recipients. These made up $149 billion in the most recent fiscal year. Even if DOGE managed to root out all of these payments — a difficult task for many technical reasons, The Wall Street Journal reported — it would shrink the deficit by only 8 percent.

Similarly, shrinking the federal work force can do only so much. Even if Musk managed to fire every civilian employee and cut their benefits — an outlandish scenario — he would reduce the deficit by just 14 percent.

Sources: Congressional Budget Office; Treasury Department | By The New York Times

Some layoffs could even increase the deficit. The Biden administration wanted to hire more workers at the Internal Revenue Service to crack down on tax cheats. Experts said the plan would bring in $2.5 in tax revenue for every $1 spent. Trump wants to get rid of the new employees anyway.

DOGE claims it has slashed $130 billion in spending. But its ledger is filled with errors, my colleagues David Fahrenthold and Jeremy Singer-Vine reported. The agency has revised its estimate downward multiple times, in acknowledgments of mistakes.

In the end, the debt problem remains what it has long been: Republicans and Democrats refuse to cut popular but expensive federal programs and don’t want to raise taxes on most Americans. As long as that’s true, the federal government will remain in the red.



   
ReplyQuote
(@pizzaman)
Prominent Member Customer
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 650
Topic starter  

Here is an article from Reuters about US deficits rising into the future:

CBO sees US deficits rising over 30 years, economic growth slowing

WASHINGTON, March 27 (Reuters) - The U.S. Congressional Budget Office on Thursday projected significant increases in federal budget deficits and debt over the next 30 years, in part due to rapidly rising interest costs, as it sketched out sluggish economic growth and a shrinking workforce.
The CBO's latest long-term budget projections show federal deficits accelerating to 7.3% of the economy in fiscal year 2055 from 6.2% in 2025. That is up from the 30-year average from 1995 to 2024 of 3.9%.
The U.S. public debt meanwhile is seen rising alarmingly, to 156% of GDP in 2055 from 100% in 2025.
As the non-partisan budget analyst for Congress, the CBO bases its projections on current law, which could change significantly in the short-term.
That is due in part to the push now underway by President Donald Trump and his fellow Republicans who control the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives to slash federal spending and the government's workforce, while also extending costly tax cuts that are due to expire at the end of this year under current law.
“As bad as this outlook is, it represents an 'optimistic scenario,’ because policymakers are currently considering adding trillions more in tax cut extensions, which would add to the debt," said Michael Peterson, head of the Peter G. Peterson Foundation, which advocates fiscal policy reforms.
There are estimates that extending those tax cuts for a decade could add around $4.6 trillion to deficits and debt. House Republicans have proposed spending cuts, including to federal healthcare programs, to achieve some savings.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/cbo-sees-us-deficits-rising-over-30-years-economic-growth-slowing-2025-03-27/

I think this is more evidence that tax rates will need to be increased in the future.



   
ReplyQuote
(@pizzaman)
Prominent Member Customer
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 650
Topic starter  

I truly believe that one of the most important pieces of information to enter into PRC is future tax rates, which of course directly relates to Roth conversions. One major reason way US deficits are growing is that the top percent or two of people in the country and large companies are not paying there fair share of taxes. This article shows that the disparity is only getting worst, which doesn't bode well for future tax rates:

A new Redfin report shows just how deep the wealth gap in America really runs. According to the data, the wealthiest 1% of Americans—about 1.3 million households—have a combined net worth of $49.2 trillion. That figure is nearly equal to the total value of all homes in the U.S, which reached $49.7 trillion at the end of 2024.

Meanwhile, the bottom 50% of Americans have a combined net worth of just $3.9 trillion, less than 8% of the total held by the top 1%. Of that, $1.8 trillion is tied up in real estate, and most of it comes with heavy debt loads. Lower-income households own $4.9 trillion worth of homes but owe $3.1 trillion in mortgage debt.

The Top 0.1% Are Even Further Ahead

Zoom in further and you’ll find that the richest of the rich are pulling away even faster. The top 0.1% of Americans—about 134,000 households with a net worth of at least $46.3 million—now hold $22.1 trillion. That’s enough to buy every home in the 25 most populous U.S. metro areas, including New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Atlanta and Boston.

Their wealth grew by $4.4 trillion in the past two years alone. That’s more than the total wealth held by the bottom 50% of Americans.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/report-reveals-americas-1-rich-230041166.html



   
ReplyQuote
(@pizzaman)
Prominent Member Customer
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 650
Topic starter  

I found this recent Freakonomics podcast about the Federal Government's financial situation in which they interview Stephen Dubner. Part of the podcast has 10 myths about the US tax system - a must listen! The rest of the podcast explains how royally screwed-up the US government is financially, real depressing stuff and provides more evidence that tax rates must go up:

"In Washington, D.C., there is a set of people who move into town when their party comes to power, and who eventually leave once their party is voted out. These are the high-profile residents of D.C., the ones who make headlines. But for every one of these people, there are thousands more that you rarely hear about, or hear from. This is the other Washington, D.C. These people work behind the scenes on all sorts of important matters like U.S. tax policy, or the runaway national debt. Our guest today is a specialist in both those matters."

https://freakonomics.com/podcast/ten-myths-about-the-u-s-tax-system/



   
ReplyQuote
(@pizzaman)
Prominent Member Customer
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 650
Topic starter  

Roth Conversion Green Alert!!!

With the US stock market crashing and the economy possibly headed into recession, get your plans ready to conduct sizeable Roth conversion(s) in the next few months. I did this back in March 2020 during the Covid pandemic market drop. Within 6 months I not only got the amount of taxes I paid for the conversion back because the stock market returned to it's previous level, but then it kept climbing 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑.



   
ReplyQuote
Share: